ARC recently announced that it had completed the sale of $200 million in Notes via a private placement and that the notes were priced to yield 11%. I was surprised at the high rate of interest ARC is going to be paying on these notes.
Trading (volume) activity in ARC stock has been very high the past week, during which time ARC’s price-per-share has declined. I asked a financially-savvy friend for his opinion about the recent high volume of trading in ARC stock, and he said that the higher volume (with the price-per-share trending down slightly) could be because “capital structure arbitrage” firms have bought the new ARC Notes and, as a hedge against their investment in the Notes, are shorting shares of ARC stock. I had no idea what he meant when he said “capital structure arbitrage", and, after Google-research and reading a couple of articles about that subject, I still don’t know how that works. Maybe you do?
I also looked at a three other fairly recent private placement unsecured “Notes” offerings; Scotts, SAIC, and Landry’s, to compare them to the yield on ARC’s Notes. Scotts and SAIC (both public companies) got a very decent interest rate compared to the interest rate ARC is going to be paying. Landry’s (private company) is going to be paying even a higher interest rate than ARC.
Dec 13 2010 (Reuters) - Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG.N) on
Monday sold $200 million of senior notes in the 144a private
placement market, said IFR, a Thomson Reuters service.
Bank of America Merrill Lynch and JP Morgan were the joint
bookrunning managers for the sale.
BORROWER: SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY
AMT $200 MLN COUPON 6.625 PCT MATURITY 12/15/2020
TYPE SR NTS ISS PRICE 100 FIRST PAY 6/15/2011
MOODY'S B1 YIELD 6.625 PCT SETTLEMENT 12/16/2010
S&P BB-MINUS SPREAD 334 BPS PAY FREQ SEMI-ANNUAL
FITCH N/A MORE THAN TREAS NON-CALLABLE 5 YRS*
*MAKE-WHOLE CALL 50 BPS
Dec 13 (Reuters) - SAIC Inc (SAI.N) on Monday sold $750
million of senior unsecured notes in two parts in the 144a
private placement market, said a market source.
The notes are guaranteed by Science Applications
International Corp.
Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley
were the joint bookrunning managers for the sale.
BORROWER: SAIC INC
TRANCHE 1
AMT $450 MLN COUPON 4.45 PCT MATURITY 12/1/2020
TYPE SR NTS ISS PRICE 99.637 FIRST PAY 6/1/2011
MOODY'S A3 YIELD 4.496 PCT SETTLEMENT 12/20/2010
S&P A-MINUS SPREAD 120 BPS PAY FREQ SEMI-ANNUAL
FITCH N/A MORE THAN TREAS MAKE-WHOLE CALL 20 BPS
TRANCHE 2
AMT $300 MLN COUPON 5.95 PCT MATURITY 12/1/2040
TYPE SR NTS ISS PRICE 99.851 FIRST PAY 6/1/2011
MOODY'S A3 YIELD 5.961 PCT SETTLEMENT 12/20/2010
S&P A-MINUS SPREAD 155 BPS PAY FREQ SEMI-ANNUAL
FITCH N/A MORE THAN TREAS MAKE-WHOLE CALL 25 BPS
HOUSTON, Dec. 14, 2010 /PRNewswire/ -- Landry's Restaurants, Inc. ("Landry's" or the "Company") today announced that it intends to offer up to an additional $87.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11 5/8% senior secured notes due 2015 (the "Additional Notes") in a private placement not registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The Additional Notes will have the same terms and be part of the same series as the $453.5 million aggregate principal amount of 11 5/8% senior secured notes due 2015 which were previously issued. Proceeds from the offering will be used to pay for the acquisition of Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. Restaurants, Inc., if such acquisition is consummated; to pay related fees and expenses; and for general corporate purposes.
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Monday, December 13, 2010
Two of ARC's software products receive "BERTL's Best" Awards
The other day, I read about ARC receiving BERTL AWARDS for two of ARC’s software products:
*** AbacusPCR was awarded Best Print Tracking Solution in the marketplace in 2010.
*** PlanWell Collaborate was recognized as 2010’s Best AEC Project Management and Collaboration Tool.
Inasmuch as BERTL “best of” awards are not easy to come by, these awards were very impressive.
I haven’t ready the full articles about these two particular awards, so, in making these award selections, I have no idea what other “products” ARC’s products were compared to. If anyone knows that information, how about posting a comment with that information.
*** AbacusPCR was awarded Best Print Tracking Solution in the marketplace in 2010.
*** PlanWell Collaborate was recognized as 2010’s Best AEC Project Management and Collaboration Tool.
Inasmuch as BERTL “best of” awards are not easy to come by, these awards were very impressive.
I haven’t ready the full articles about these two particular awards, so, in making these award selections, I have no idea what other “products” ARC’s products were compared to. If anyone knows that information, how about posting a comment with that information.
Friday, December 10, 2010
NGI (National Graphic Imaging) - acknowledgements
Next week will mark the 3rd anniversary of ARC's purchase of NGI (National Graphic Imaging), and, wow, there have been a lot of changes in the ranks since NGI became an ARC-owned company.
ARC purchased NGI one month after the recession started, but who knew then that the recession had started and who had any idea that the A/E/C industry and the Reprographics industry would be impacted as harshly as what's happened because of the "Great" Recession.
NGI (National Graphic Imaging) was sold to ARC in December 2007. NGI was a powerhouse operation in Florida, with operations in Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Ocala and plans to establish operations in South Florida. NGI also conducted operations in Atlanta. Even though ARC owned operations in Florida and Georgia before ARC acquired NGI, NGI was, evidently, a key target for ARC. Sometime after ARC acquired NGI, NGI absorbed into its operations the other ARC owned brands in NGI’s Florida markets, including TRS (Tampa, St Pete, Clearwater) and Orlando Reprographics (Orlando.) Not long after ARC acquired NGI, Greg Williams, President of NGI assumed the role of President of ARC’s Florida operations, including T-Square in South Florida.
As that saying goes, “that was then and this is now”, times have changed. Today, NGI is predominately managed by ex Ridgway’s employees (Ridgway’s is another reprographics enterprise ARC purchased, several years before ARC purchased NGI.) All of NGI’s senior management team (with the exception of Martha Korman, former CEO of NGI and who is now a member of ARC’s Global Accounts team) are gone from NGI and ARC.
I would like to stop for a minute to acknowledge the former senior management team of NGI, the management team that created a powerhouse operation in Florida. Without the tireless efforts and dedication of this management team, NGI would not have become a powerhouse operation in Florida. None of the following people are still working for NGI or ARC:
Greg Williams – President & Chief Operating Officer
Craig Bell – Chief Technology Officer
Craig Hubbard – Chief Financial Officer
David Fitz – Controller
Pete Vassos – Vice President, Production/Customer Service Operations
Bob Paschal – Vice President, Sales & Marketing
Danny Kane – General Manager of Imaging Products Group (IPG), division of NGI
I would further like to acknowledge the fantastic contributions made by other former members of the NGI team, people who are no longer with NGI or ARC, for these were the people who operated “on the front lines” and made it all happen:
Former NGI Sales team members who are no longer with NGI or ARC:
Esther Leonard (Tampa)
Marie Mosely (Tampa)
Maureen Michel (Orlando)
Terri Davis (Jacksonville)
Collin Zucharelli (Atlanta)
Former Production Center Managers who are no longer with NGI or ARC:
Alex Prieto (Tampa Westshore)
Reggie Jackson (Atlanta)
Eric Cardona (Orlando)
Danny Landon (Jacksonville)
Rob Faiella (St Petersburg)
Randy Faiella (Tampa Downtown)
And, Program Managers who are no longer with NGI or ARC:
Dave Shives (Color Program Manager, NGI)
And, of course, I can’t forget to acknowledge the fantastic contributions made by other members of the NGI team who are still with NGI:
NGI Sales team members who are still with NGI:
Dave Powers (Orlando)
JD Loudermill (Jacksonville)
Production Center Managers who are still with NGI:
Robert Posada (Ocala)
And, Program Managers who are still with NGI:
Craig Sterner (FM Operations Manager)
As you can see, very few of the “core of NGI’s team” are still with NGI. Time marches on. Changes happen.
This post authored by Joel Salus, former Senior Vice President and Chief Business Strategist (aha!) at NGI
ARC purchased NGI one month after the recession started, but who knew then that the recession had started and who had any idea that the A/E/C industry and the Reprographics industry would be impacted as harshly as what's happened because of the "Great" Recession.
NGI (National Graphic Imaging) was sold to ARC in December 2007. NGI was a powerhouse operation in Florida, with operations in Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Ocala and plans to establish operations in South Florida. NGI also conducted operations in Atlanta. Even though ARC owned operations in Florida and Georgia before ARC acquired NGI, NGI was, evidently, a key target for ARC. Sometime after ARC acquired NGI, NGI absorbed into its operations the other ARC owned brands in NGI’s Florida markets, including TRS (Tampa, St Pete, Clearwater) and Orlando Reprographics (Orlando.) Not long after ARC acquired NGI, Greg Williams, President of NGI assumed the role of President of ARC’s Florida operations, including T-Square in South Florida.
As that saying goes, “that was then and this is now”, times have changed. Today, NGI is predominately managed by ex Ridgway’s employees (Ridgway’s is another reprographics enterprise ARC purchased, several years before ARC purchased NGI.) All of NGI’s senior management team (with the exception of Martha Korman, former CEO of NGI and who is now a member of ARC’s Global Accounts team) are gone from NGI and ARC.
I would like to stop for a minute to acknowledge the former senior management team of NGI, the management team that created a powerhouse operation in Florida. Without the tireless efforts and dedication of this management team, NGI would not have become a powerhouse operation in Florida. None of the following people are still working for NGI or ARC:
Greg Williams – President & Chief Operating Officer
Craig Bell – Chief Technology Officer
Craig Hubbard – Chief Financial Officer
David Fitz – Controller
Pete Vassos – Vice President, Production/Customer Service Operations
Bob Paschal – Vice President, Sales & Marketing
Danny Kane – General Manager of Imaging Products Group (IPG), division of NGI
I would further like to acknowledge the fantastic contributions made by other former members of the NGI team, people who are no longer with NGI or ARC, for these were the people who operated “on the front lines” and made it all happen:
Former NGI Sales team members who are no longer with NGI or ARC:
Esther Leonard (Tampa)
Marie Mosely (Tampa)
Maureen Michel (Orlando)
Terri Davis (Jacksonville)
Collin Zucharelli (Atlanta)
Former Production Center Managers who are no longer with NGI or ARC:
Alex Prieto (Tampa Westshore)
Reggie Jackson (Atlanta)
Eric Cardona (Orlando)
Danny Landon (Jacksonville)
Rob Faiella (St Petersburg)
Randy Faiella (Tampa Downtown)
And, Program Managers who are no longer with NGI or ARC:
Dave Shives (Color Program Manager, NGI)
And, of course, I can’t forget to acknowledge the fantastic contributions made by other members of the NGI team who are still with NGI:
NGI Sales team members who are still with NGI:
Dave Powers (Orlando)
JD Loudermill (Jacksonville)
Production Center Managers who are still with NGI:
Robert Posada (Ocala)
And, Program Managers who are still with NGI:
Craig Sterner (FM Operations Manager)
As you can see, very few of the “core of NGI’s team” are still with NGI. Time marches on. Changes happen.
This post authored by Joel Salus, former Senior Vice President and Chief Business Strategist (aha!) at NGI
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Time to buy a vacation home in Spain ???
(Found on Bloomberg and, while reading, I thought to myself.......IS IT TIME TO BUY A VACATION HOME IN SPAIN ...... or should you wait until next year?)
The number of foreclosed homes for sale in Spain may triple next year as new accounting rules prompt lenders to dump their depreciating assets, according to the co-founder of a website that advertises repossessed properties.
About 100,000 houses and apartments owned by banks are now on the market, Fernando Acuna said in an interview. A quarter of them are listed on the website operated by his Madrid-based company, Pisos Embargados de Bancos, on behalf of 25 banks.
Spanish lenders have a total of 181 billion euros ($242 billion) in “troubled” construction and real estate loans, the Bank of Spain said last month. Since Sept. 30, the banks have been required to account for falling property values more quickly, encouraging them to shed assets without waiting for the market to recover from a three-year decline.
“Lenders took on an immense amount of property from developers and homeowners and now they’re being forced to offload the deadwood,” Acuna said.
About 2,600 real-estate and construction companies have gone out of business in the past two years, according to credit insurer Credito y Caucion, while unemployment has more than doubled to almost 20 percent since 2007. The cost of cleaning up the banking industry’s books has so far been about 70 billion euros in the form of government bailout funds, asset writedowns and use of reserves, according to the Bank of Spain.
Price Reductions
“By changing the rules on provisions, the central bank has really put a shotgun to their heads,” said Fernando Rodriguez y Rodriguez de Acuna, founder of Madrid-based property adviser R.R. de Acuna & Asociados. “The banks will have to cut their price expectations more aggressively to reduce their stock of homes.”
Property values will fall 20 percent over the next five years, Rodriguez y Rodriguez de Acuna estimates. Most of the declines will come in 2011, he said. Since the Spanish market’s peak in April 2007, home prices have dropped 22.5 percent, according to a survey by real-estate website Fotocasa.es and IESE Business School.
Under the changes introduced by the Bank of Spain in September, lenders must take account of a drop in value of at least 30 percent if they keep the assets for more than two years. They must also make provisions for bad loans after 12 months, rather than as long as 72 months.
The new rules will lead to an average increase in provisions for 2010 of 2 percent, the central bank said in May. They will also knock off an average of 10 percent from the pretax profit that lenders generate from their Spanish businesses, the Bank of Spain said.
Missed Target
Banco Santander SA, the biggest Spanish bank, said on Oct. 28 that it set aside 472 million euros to account for impaired assets and will miss its 2010 earnings goal because of the changes.
“Banks are in a delicate position,” said Fernando Encinar, co-founder of Idealista.com, Spain’s largest property website. “They’ve realized that it’s probably better to get rid of their real estate rather than prolong the problem.”
Idealista currently advertises 29,334 bank-owned homes in Spain. In 2008 it didn’t list any.
About 280,000 people in Spain will lose their homes this year, according to Spanish consumer protection association ADICAE.
To contact the reporter on this story: Sharon Smyth in Madrid at ssmyth2@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Andrew Blackman at ablackman@bloomberg.net.
The number of foreclosed homes for sale in Spain may triple next year as new accounting rules prompt lenders to dump their depreciating assets, according to the co-founder of a website that advertises repossessed properties.
About 100,000 houses and apartments owned by banks are now on the market, Fernando Acuna said in an interview. A quarter of them are listed on the website operated by his Madrid-based company, Pisos Embargados de Bancos, on behalf of 25 banks.
Spanish lenders have a total of 181 billion euros ($242 billion) in “troubled” construction and real estate loans, the Bank of Spain said last month. Since Sept. 30, the banks have been required to account for falling property values more quickly, encouraging them to shed assets without waiting for the market to recover from a three-year decline.
“Lenders took on an immense amount of property from developers and homeowners and now they’re being forced to offload the deadwood,” Acuna said.
About 2,600 real-estate and construction companies have gone out of business in the past two years, according to credit insurer Credito y Caucion, while unemployment has more than doubled to almost 20 percent since 2007. The cost of cleaning up the banking industry’s books has so far been about 70 billion euros in the form of government bailout funds, asset writedowns and use of reserves, according to the Bank of Spain.
Price Reductions
“By changing the rules on provisions, the central bank has really put a shotgun to their heads,” said Fernando Rodriguez y Rodriguez de Acuna, founder of Madrid-based property adviser R.R. de Acuna & Asociados. “The banks will have to cut their price expectations more aggressively to reduce their stock of homes.”
Property values will fall 20 percent over the next five years, Rodriguez y Rodriguez de Acuna estimates. Most of the declines will come in 2011, he said. Since the Spanish market’s peak in April 2007, home prices have dropped 22.5 percent, according to a survey by real-estate website Fotocasa.es and IESE Business School.
Under the changes introduced by the Bank of Spain in September, lenders must take account of a drop in value of at least 30 percent if they keep the assets for more than two years. They must also make provisions for bad loans after 12 months, rather than as long as 72 months.
The new rules will lead to an average increase in provisions for 2010 of 2 percent, the central bank said in May. They will also knock off an average of 10 percent from the pretax profit that lenders generate from their Spanish businesses, the Bank of Spain said.
Missed Target
Banco Santander SA, the biggest Spanish bank, said on Oct. 28 that it set aside 472 million euros to account for impaired assets and will miss its 2010 earnings goal because of the changes.
“Banks are in a delicate position,” said Fernando Encinar, co-founder of Idealista.com, Spain’s largest property website. “They’ve realized that it’s probably better to get rid of their real estate rather than prolong the problem.”
Idealista currently advertises 29,334 bank-owned homes in Spain. In 2008 it didn’t list any.
About 280,000 people in Spain will lose their homes this year, according to Spanish consumer protection association ADICAE.
To contact the reporter on this story: Sharon Smyth in Madrid at ssmyth2@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Andrew Blackman at ablackman@bloomberg.net.
Thursday, December 2, 2010
American Reprographics completes bond offering
Found on Reuters.com this morning.........
American Reprographics Company Closes Bond Offering
9:00am EST, Dec 2, 2010
American Reprographics Company announced that on December 1, 2010, it completed a private offering of senior unsecured notes due December 15, 2016, in the aggregate principal amount of $200 million (the Notes). The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company, and bear an interest rate of 10.5% per annum, payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 through the maturity date. The Notes were priced at 97.824% of par, creating a yield at issuance of 11%, and contain an optional call provision dated December 15, 2013. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering to repay its existing credit facility which was due to expire in 2012. The transaction was led by BoA Merrill Lynch, with J.P. Morgan and Wells Fargo Securities also participating as joint book-running managers. Citi was a co-manager on the transaction. Concurrent with the offering, the Company also entered into a new five-year, $50 million revolving credit line with Wells Fargo Bank with normal and customary terms and conditions.
American Reprographics Company Closes Bond Offering
9:00am EST, Dec 2, 2010
American Reprographics Company announced that on December 1, 2010, it completed a private offering of senior unsecured notes due December 15, 2016, in the aggregate principal amount of $200 million (the Notes). The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company, and bear an interest rate of 10.5% per annum, payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 through the maturity date. The Notes were priced at 97.824% of par, creating a yield at issuance of 11%, and contain an optional call provision dated December 15, 2013. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering to repay its existing credit facility which was due to expire in 2012. The transaction was led by BoA Merrill Lynch, with J.P. Morgan and Wells Fargo Securities also participating as joint book-running managers. Citi was a co-manager on the transaction. Concurrent with the offering, the Company also entered into a new five-year, $50 million revolving credit line with Wells Fargo Bank with normal and customary terms and conditions.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Comments about American Reprographics Debt Offering - ratings explained
In the previous post, I mentioned that American Reprographics (ARC) is in the process of selling notes; this, to raise funds that will be used to retire its line of credit. The existing line of credit has all sorts of covenants and restrictions. In addition, the existing line of credit requires substantial "pay-downs" of principal each quarter. It appears as though American Reprographics decided that it no longer wanted to deal with those covenants and restrictions. And, since the "new" debt will not (evidently) require quarterly or annual pay-down of principal, ARC will be able to horde cash and use it as it deems essential to its business, without having to worry about asking for permission from the financing entities that gave ARC the line of credit it is now replacing. Based on what I read about the "new" debt, ARC is supposed to receive the proceeds on or about December 1, 2010.
About the "new" debt. This new debt is "unsecured" debt. Meaning that, if there is a default on the debt, security holders (i.e., holders of the "new" debt) don't have (are not holding) "collateral", hence the term "unsecured."
Standard & Poors gave the new debt a BB- rating.
Moody's gave the new debt a B1 rating.
I was kind of surprised at the high interest rate ARC will be paying on the new debt. Nowadays, you can't earn much interest on savings accounts and CD's (today, 10 year treasury notes are yielding less than 3.0%. Want to earn substantially more than that? Well, how about ARC's new debt at a yield of around 11%. Maybe not as safe as a bank CD or a treasury note, but as to ARC's new "high-yielding" debt, ARC apparently hasn't had any difficulty paying down debt the past several years, in spite of difficult economic conditions.
I saw the credit ratings Standard & Poors and Moody's assigned to ARC's new debt. Apparently, ARC's new debt was rated "junk bond" status. That really surprised me. Anyway, who in this "new world" believes any of the ratings that S&P and Moody's come up with. Were they not the same rating agencies who gave AAA ratings to the CDO's that contained all of those exotic (or, I should say, toxic) mortgages?
Here's some information about ratings:
This first part comes from Wikipedia………..
Non-Investment Grade (also known as junk bonds)
▪ BB: more prone to changes in the economy
▪ B: financial situation varies noticeably
▪ CCC: currently vulnerable and dependent on favorable economic conditions to meet its commitments
▪ CC: highly vulnerable, very speculative bonds
▪ C: highly vulnerable, perhaps in bankruptcy or in arrears but still continuing to pay out on obligations
▪ CI: past due on interest
▪ R: under regulatory supervision due to its financial situation
▪ SD: has selectively defaulted on some obligations
▪ D: has defaulted on obligations and S&P believes that it will generally default on most or all obligations
NR: not rated
This next part comes from Standard & Poors Credit Ratings………..
What do the letter ratings mean?
The general meaning of our credit rating opinions is summarized below.
‘AAA’—Extremely strong capacity to meet financial commitments. Highest Rating.
‘AA’—Very strong capacity to meet financial commitments.
‘A’—Strong capacity to meet financial commitments, but somewhat susceptible to adverse economic conditions and changes in circumstances.
‘BBB’—Adequate capacity to meet financial commitments, but more subject to adverse economic conditions.
‘BBB-‘—Considered lowest investment grade by market participants.
‘BB+’—Considered highest speculative grade by market participants.
‘BB’—Less vulnerable in the near-term but faces major ongoing uncertainties to adverse business, financial and economic conditions.
‘B’—More vulnerable to adverse business, financial and economic conditions but currently has the capacity to meet financial commitments.
‘CCC’—Currently vulnerable and dependent on favorable business, financial and economic conditions to meet financial commitments.
‘CC’—Currently highly vulnerable.
‘C’—Currently highly vulnerable obligations and other defined circumstances.
‘D’—Payment default on financial commitments.
Note: Ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.
About the "new" debt. This new debt is "unsecured" debt. Meaning that, if there is a default on the debt, security holders (i.e., holders of the "new" debt) don't have (are not holding) "collateral", hence the term "unsecured."
Standard & Poors gave the new debt a BB- rating.
Moody's gave the new debt a B1 rating.
I was kind of surprised at the high interest rate ARC will be paying on the new debt. Nowadays, you can't earn much interest on savings accounts and CD's (today, 10 year treasury notes are yielding less than 3.0%. Want to earn substantially more than that? Well, how about ARC's new debt at a yield of around 11%. Maybe not as safe as a bank CD or a treasury note, but as to ARC's new "high-yielding" debt, ARC apparently hasn't had any difficulty paying down debt the past several years, in spite of difficult economic conditions.
I saw the credit ratings Standard & Poors and Moody's assigned to ARC's new debt. Apparently, ARC's new debt was rated "junk bond" status. That really surprised me. Anyway, who in this "new world" believes any of the ratings that S&P and Moody's come up with. Were they not the same rating agencies who gave AAA ratings to the CDO's that contained all of those exotic (or, I should say, toxic) mortgages?
Here's some information about ratings:
This first part comes from Wikipedia………..
Non-Investment Grade (also known as junk bonds)
▪ BB: more prone to changes in the economy
▪ B: financial situation varies noticeably
▪ CCC: currently vulnerable and dependent on favorable economic conditions to meet its commitments
▪ CC: highly vulnerable, very speculative bonds
▪ C: highly vulnerable, perhaps in bankruptcy or in arrears but still continuing to pay out on obligations
▪ CI: past due on interest
▪ R: under regulatory supervision due to its financial situation
▪ SD: has selectively defaulted on some obligations
▪ D: has defaulted on obligations and S&P believes that it will generally default on most or all obligations
NR: not rated
This next part comes from Standard & Poors Credit Ratings………..
What do the letter ratings mean?
The general meaning of our credit rating opinions is summarized below.
‘AAA’—Extremely strong capacity to meet financial commitments. Highest Rating.
‘AA’—Very strong capacity to meet financial commitments.
‘A’—Strong capacity to meet financial commitments, but somewhat susceptible to adverse economic conditions and changes in circumstances.
‘BBB’—Adequate capacity to meet financial commitments, but more subject to adverse economic conditions.
‘BBB-‘—Considered lowest investment grade by market participants.
‘BB+’—Considered highest speculative grade by market participants.
‘BB’—Less vulnerable in the near-term but faces major ongoing uncertainties to adverse business, financial and economic conditions.
‘B’—More vulnerable to adverse business, financial and economic conditions but currently has the capacity to meet financial commitments.
‘CCC’—Currently vulnerable and dependent on favorable business, financial and economic conditions to meet financial commitments.
‘CC’—Currently highly vulnerable.
‘C’—Currently highly vulnerable obligations and other defined circumstances.
‘D’—Payment default on financial commitments.
Note: Ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.
Thursday, November 25, 2010
American Reprographics in process of raising money through an offering of notes
BofA, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo handle American Reprographics debt sale
(This short news article was found on SmartTrading.com, Posted on: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:27:10 EST)
24 November 2010 - Bank of America Merrill Lynch, JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) acted as book-runners for American Reprographics Company's (NYSE: ARP) private placement of $200,000,000 senior notes, Reuters reported.
The transaction, which was carried out on Tuesday, was downsized from the initially planned $220,000,000, Reuters added.
The notes were set a 10.5% coupon and were priced at 97.824% to yield 11%. The coupon is payable on a semi-annual basis from 15 June 2011 until the maturity on 15 December 2016.
The deal is scheduled to settle on 1 December 2010. Standard and Poor's and Moody's assigned the issue BB- and B1 ratings, respectively.
(This short news article was found on SmartTrading.com, Posted on: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:27:10 EST)
24 November 2010 - Bank of America Merrill Lynch, JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) acted as book-runners for American Reprographics Company's (NYSE: ARP) private placement of $200,000,000 senior notes, Reuters reported.
The transaction, which was carried out on Tuesday, was downsized from the initially planned $220,000,000, Reuters added.
The notes were set a 10.5% coupon and were priced at 97.824% to yield 11%. The coupon is payable on a semi-annual basis from 15 June 2011 until the maturity on 15 December 2016.
The deal is scheduled to settle on 1 December 2010. Standard and Poor's and Moody's assigned the issue BB- and B1 ratings, respectively.
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Service Point Announces Q3 2010 Results
Service Point SolutionsQ3 2010 Results
(www.servicepoint.net), (per report found on SP’s web-site, dated November 15, 2010.)
I was unable to find an English version of SP’s report, so I used Google translate to translate the report from Spanish to English. While Google translate is pretty good, it is not perfect!
Through the first 9 months of 2010, SP’s sales, at 154 million Euro, appear to be approximately 5% off sales reported for the first 9 months of 2009.
Compared to sales in 2009, Service Point said that sales declined less in Q3 2010 (vs. Q3 2009) than was the case in the first half of 2010 (vs. the first half of 2009.)
Comparing SP’s Q3 2010 vs. Q3 2009:
Sales, Q3 2010 – 48.3 million Euro
Sales, Q3 2009 – 49.3 million Euro
EBITDA, Q3 2010 – (.3) million Euro (loss)
EBITDA, Q3 2009 – 1.4 million Euro
Net Income, Q3 2010 – (4.7) million Euro (loss)
Net Income, Q3 2009 – (2.8) million Euro (loss)
Blog author's comment: Q3 2010 was not a pretty picture. Not only a loss on the Net Income line, but an EBITDA loss as well.
My comments about what Service Point said about “sector” performance:
Per what Service Point said in the report, “In terms of sectors, financial and educational business continues its strong performance and continues to show strength in all branches of the group.”
Translating these statements from Spanish to English were not easy; it “sounds like” this were the points that SP was attempting to explain about its performance in the AEC sector: In regard to the AEC (engineering, construction, architecture), which accounts for approximately one third of sales, the decline of sales in the AEC sector is slowing, compared to the decline over previous quarters but still has setbacks. This sector is one that is weighing on growth. Group net sales for all sectors, except for this sector, have increased
And, Service Point talked about these initiatives:
SPS has strengthened the team's American branch with the addition of a new head person, who was previously head of, and responsible for, the management of the financial sector (of SP’s business) in the UK (the latter, experiencing double-digit growth). His short-term priority will be to develop business in the U.S. operations in education and financial sectors, sectors that are growing faster in the group and have shown anti-cyclical.
In previous reports and announcements, SP talked about acquisitions it was currently targeting and/or negotiating. In the Nov 15th, 2010 report, here’s something about that, translated by Google from Spanish to English:
“As announced by the company in General Meeting and notes of previous results, the company negotiates selectively in two key areas identified for development of the group, Germany, Scandinavia and growth phase. These operations are in final stage, estimating to announce the first acquisition in the first quarter of 2011.”
So, it “sounds like” SP will be announcing an acquisition sometime during Q1 2011. Question: Will the acquisition be in Germany, Denmark, Iceland (highly doubtful), Norway, Sweden or Finland? (I think I know, but I’m not saying.)
SP’s French company, Reprotechnique, remains a drag on SP’s performance. SP’s Nov 15 report said this (Google translation from Spanish to English):
“On August 3 Reprotechnique shareholders (Service Point 51%) called the situation "redressement Judiciaire" in order to undertake a thorough operational and financial review being carried out successfully in the face to be viable as soon as possible to this venture.”
Well, after I saw the term, “redressement Judiciaire”, I had to look that up to see what it meant in English.
Redressement judiciaire = Receivership
Receivership is a measure ordered by the court of commerce when a company is insolvent.
An insolvency procedure is initiated when the company is unable to cope with current liabilities with its available assets is to say she met financial difficulties. Legally, it is said that the company is in a state of insolvency. The purpose of this procedure is to allow the continued operation of the business, maintaining employment and settle its debts.
At the trial opening, the court will appoint:
- A bankruptcy judge: it is responsible to ensure expeditious conduct of proceedings and protection of interests.
- An administrator: his appointment by the court is compulsory until the company reaches certain threshold (3 million euros in sales and at least 20 employees). The administrator may have either a monitoring mission of the debtor (the company executives retain their full power) is an assistance mission (there is a joint management between the leaders and the administrator) or a representative mission (the director becomes the legal representative of the company).
- An agent or legal representative of creditors who will act on behalf and in the collective interest of creditors and whose mission includes establishing the list of creditors. It's his hands that creditors of the company must submit a claim.
Now that you’ve read about what a “redressement Judiciaire” means, take that into consideration when you read the Google translated (Spanish to) English version of the comments Service Point made in the Nov 15th report:
Restructuring plan of the investee Reprotechnique in France (Service Point 51%);
As announced in the previous note of results of the company, the shareholders of Reprotechnique, a French company in which Service Point has a 51% and acquired in June 2008, have proceeded to the official statement of the situation "redressement Judiciaire "in order to harness its economic record and undertake a plan to make viable the subsidiary, while not involving an additional financial burden on the resources of the shareholders.
By the situation of "redressement Judiciaire" The aim is to undertake a thorough operational and financial restructuring to keep only the production facilities that provide benefits, restructuring or closing which are not. This process allows the game to freeze the company's creditors and can negotiate in a timely manner to manage a company financially viable. Under this circumstance, the French market continues to be of interest to Service Point.
A dated August 3, the Commercial Court of Créteil approved the status of "Redressenment Judiciare (bankruptcy) of Reprotechnique, having been renewed on October 15 the proceedings, setting a review date next February 2011. This has opened an observation period, in which there is continuity of the business of the company, with a freeze on the old debt, and with contributions from the Employment Tribunal in the process of saving jobs (EREs) that are executed in the coming months.
It is proceeding with the Labour Court plan below (ERE) that affects workers of the company, of which a portion will be dispensed in November, and another in February. The negotiations with works councils, social and trade unions tried already in final stage and is expected to complete the first phase in early November.
Additionally, using the judiciare redressement process has proceeded to consolidate production facilities and sale of nonstrategic assets. The sale process has been done through an "electronic tender", supervised by the commercial court, and is scheduled for November as the date of execution and acceptance of final bids.
A consultant has been selected by SPS prestige and the commercial court as the auditor of the financial model of reorganization. According to the model of this consultant covering the period 2010-2020, the company can support the restructuring plan and overcome the observation period and debt repayments. According to the model will be positive cash flow from early 2011
Is estimated to be in a position Reprotechnique "redressement Judiciaire" during a period of one year in which the company will continue operating and serving customers as before.
This decision is made to shield the shareholders and not to harm the group's cash like the results. Through this restructuring, the subsidiary of a 51% Service
Service Point can emerge stronger French business. The cash flow supports the assessment of the value of RT in the consolidated balance sheet of the group
(www.servicepoint.net), (per report found on SP’s web-site, dated November 15, 2010.)
I was unable to find an English version of SP’s report, so I used Google translate to translate the report from Spanish to English. While Google translate is pretty good, it is not perfect!
Through the first 9 months of 2010, SP’s sales, at 154 million Euro, appear to be approximately 5% off sales reported for the first 9 months of 2009.
Compared to sales in 2009, Service Point said that sales declined less in Q3 2010 (vs. Q3 2009) than was the case in the first half of 2010 (vs. the first half of 2009.)
Comparing SP’s Q3 2010 vs. Q3 2009:
Sales, Q3 2010 – 48.3 million Euro
Sales, Q3 2009 – 49.3 million Euro
EBITDA, Q3 2010 – (.3) million Euro (loss)
EBITDA, Q3 2009 – 1.4 million Euro
Net Income, Q3 2010 – (4.7) million Euro (loss)
Net Income, Q3 2009 – (2.8) million Euro (loss)
Blog author's comment: Q3 2010 was not a pretty picture. Not only a loss on the Net Income line, but an EBITDA loss as well.
My comments about what Service Point said about “sector” performance:
Per what Service Point said in the report, “In terms of sectors, financial and educational business continues its strong performance and continues to show strength in all branches of the group.”
Translating these statements from Spanish to English were not easy; it “sounds like” this were the points that SP was attempting to explain about its performance in the AEC sector: In regard to the AEC (engineering, construction, architecture), which accounts for approximately one third of sales, the decline of sales in the AEC sector is slowing, compared to the decline over previous quarters but still has setbacks. This sector is one that is weighing on growth. Group net sales for all sectors, except for this sector, have increased
And, Service Point talked about these initiatives:
SPS has strengthened the team's American branch with the addition of a new head person, who was previously head of, and responsible for, the management of the financial sector (of SP’s business) in the UK (the latter, experiencing double-digit growth). His short-term priority will be to develop business in the U.S. operations in education and financial sectors, sectors that are growing faster in the group and have shown anti-cyclical.
In previous reports and announcements, SP talked about acquisitions it was currently targeting and/or negotiating. In the Nov 15th, 2010 report, here’s something about that, translated by Google from Spanish to English:
“As announced by the company in General Meeting and notes of previous results, the company negotiates selectively in two key areas identified for development of the group, Germany, Scandinavia and growth phase. These operations are in final stage, estimating to announce the first acquisition in the first quarter of 2011.”
So, it “sounds like” SP will be announcing an acquisition sometime during Q1 2011. Question: Will the acquisition be in Germany, Denmark, Iceland (highly doubtful), Norway, Sweden or Finland? (I think I know, but I’m not saying.)
SP’s French company, Reprotechnique, remains a drag on SP’s performance. SP’s Nov 15 report said this (Google translation from Spanish to English):
“On August 3 Reprotechnique shareholders (Service Point 51%) called the situation "redressement Judiciaire" in order to undertake a thorough operational and financial review being carried out successfully in the face to be viable as soon as possible to this venture.”
Well, after I saw the term, “redressement Judiciaire”, I had to look that up to see what it meant in English.
Redressement judiciaire = Receivership
Receivership is a measure ordered by the court of commerce when a company is insolvent.
An insolvency procedure is initiated when the company is unable to cope with current liabilities with its available assets is to say she met financial difficulties. Legally, it is said that the company is in a state of insolvency. The purpose of this procedure is to allow the continued operation of the business, maintaining employment and settle its debts.
At the trial opening, the court will appoint:
- A bankruptcy judge: it is responsible to ensure expeditious conduct of proceedings and protection of interests.
- An administrator: his appointment by the court is compulsory until the company reaches certain threshold (3 million euros in sales and at least 20 employees). The administrator may have either a monitoring mission of the debtor (the company executives retain their full power) is an assistance mission (there is a joint management between the leaders and the administrator) or a representative mission (the director becomes the legal representative of the company).
- An agent or legal representative of creditors who will act on behalf and in the collective interest of creditors and whose mission includes establishing the list of creditors. It's his hands that creditors of the company must submit a claim.
Now that you’ve read about what a “redressement Judiciaire” means, take that into consideration when you read the Google translated (Spanish to) English version of the comments Service Point made in the Nov 15th report:
Restructuring plan of the investee Reprotechnique in France (Service Point 51%);
As announced in the previous note of results of the company, the shareholders of Reprotechnique, a French company in which Service Point has a 51% and acquired in June 2008, have proceeded to the official statement of the situation "redressement Judiciaire "in order to harness its economic record and undertake a plan to make viable the subsidiary, while not involving an additional financial burden on the resources of the shareholders.
By the situation of "redressement Judiciaire" The aim is to undertake a thorough operational and financial restructuring to keep only the production facilities that provide benefits, restructuring or closing which are not. This process allows the game to freeze the company's creditors and can negotiate in a timely manner to manage a company financially viable. Under this circumstance, the French market continues to be of interest to Service Point.
A dated August 3, the Commercial Court of Créteil approved the status of "Redressenment Judiciare (bankruptcy) of Reprotechnique, having been renewed on October 15 the proceedings, setting a review date next February 2011. This has opened an observation period, in which there is continuity of the business of the company, with a freeze on the old debt, and with contributions from the Employment Tribunal in the process of saving jobs (EREs) that are executed in the coming months.
It is proceeding with the Labour Court plan below (ERE) that affects workers of the company, of which a portion will be dispensed in November, and another in February. The negotiations with works councils, social and trade unions tried already in final stage and is expected to complete the first phase in early November.
Additionally, using the judiciare redressement process has proceeded to consolidate production facilities and sale of nonstrategic assets. The sale process has been done through an "electronic tender", supervised by the commercial court, and is scheduled for November as the date of execution and acceptance of final bids.
A consultant has been selected by SPS prestige and the commercial court as the auditor of the financial model of reorganization. According to the model of this consultant covering the period 2010-2020, the company can support the restructuring plan and overcome the observation period and debt repayments. According to the model will be positive cash flow from early 2011
Is estimated to be in a position Reprotechnique "redressement Judiciaire" during a period of one year in which the company will continue operating and serving customers as before.
This decision is made to shield the shareholders and not to harm the group's cash like the results. Through this restructuring, the subsidiary of a 51% Service
Service Point can emerge stronger French business. The cash flow supports the assessment of the value of RT in the consolidated balance sheet of the group
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
AIA ABI Index for October 2010
It looks like it's going to be "flip-flop-flip-flop" for a few more months.
Architecture Billings Index Reverts Back into Negative Territory
Inquiries for new projects remain extremely high
Contact: Scott Frank
202-626-7467
sfrank@aia.org
http://twitter.com/AIA_Media
For immediate release:
Washington, D.C. – November 17, 2010 – Following the first positive reading since January 2008 (which happened last month, September), the Architecture Billings Index (ABI) dropped nearly two points in October. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI reflects the approximate nine to twelve month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the October ABI score was 48.7, down from a reading of 50.4 the previous month. This score reflects a decrease in demand for design services (any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings). The new projects inquiry index was 61.7, down slightly from a nearly three-year high mark of 62.3 in September.
“This is disappointing news, but not altogether that surprising,” said AIA Chief Economist Kermit Baker, PhD, Hon. AIA. “We were anticipating a slow recovery period and it is likely that there will be some fits and starts before conditions show consistent improvement. Right now, reluctance from lending institutions to provide credit for construction projects and a sluggish economy are the main impediments to a revival of the design and construction industry.”
Key October ABI highlights:
Regional averages: Northeast (54.5), Midwest (51.8), South (48.6), West (44.3)
Sector index breakdown: commercial / industrial (54.5), institutional (50.8), multi-family residential (49.1), mixed practice (43.2)
Project inquiries index: 61.7
Architecture Billings Index Reverts Back into Negative Territory
Inquiries for new projects remain extremely high
Contact: Scott Frank
202-626-7467
sfrank@aia.org
http://twitter.com/AIA_Media
For immediate release:
Washington, D.C. – November 17, 2010 – Following the first positive reading since January 2008 (which happened last month, September), the Architecture Billings Index (ABI) dropped nearly two points in October. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI reflects the approximate nine to twelve month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the October ABI score was 48.7, down from a reading of 50.4 the previous month. This score reflects a decrease in demand for design services (any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings). The new projects inquiry index was 61.7, down slightly from a nearly three-year high mark of 62.3 in September.
“This is disappointing news, but not altogether that surprising,” said AIA Chief Economist Kermit Baker, PhD, Hon. AIA. “We were anticipating a slow recovery period and it is likely that there will be some fits and starts before conditions show consistent improvement. Right now, reluctance from lending institutions to provide credit for construction projects and a sluggish economy are the main impediments to a revival of the design and construction industry.”
Key October ABI highlights:
Regional averages: Northeast (54.5), Midwest (51.8), South (48.6), West (44.3)
Sector index breakdown: commercial / industrial (54.5), institutional (50.8), multi-family residential (49.1), mixed practice (43.2)
Project inquiries index: 61.7
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
ARC (NYSE: ARP) Q3 2010 Results
(This post was originally written the day ARC announced its Q2 2010 results, but I forgot to activate the post.)
After the market closed today, ARC reported its Q3 2010 results
Considering the fact that ARC released the bad news (the downward EPS and cash-flow revisions ARC previously announced) on October 11th, there were no surprises, whatsoever, in today’s Q3 2010 results press release.
Sales for Q3 2010 - $109.4 million
Sales for Q3 2009 - $119.4 million
Earnings for Q3 2010 - $300,000 (prox) (excluding the Goodwill impairment charge)
Earnings for Q3 2009 - $2.9 million (excluding Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges and excluding a charges related to ARC’s credit agreements)
EPS for Q3 2010 - $.01 per share (excluding the Goodwill impairment charge)
EPS for Q3 2009 - $.06 per share (excluding Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges and excluding a charges related to ARC’s credit agreements)
ARC’s Sales, for the first 9 months of 2010, came in at $336.7 million
ARC’s Sales, for the first 9 months of 2009, came in at $389.9 million
ARC’s Sales, for Q4 2009, came in at $111.7 million
ARC’s Sales for the full year 2009, came in at $501.6 million
In a post I did on this blog on August 4th, 2010, I “guessed” that ARC’s full-year 2010 Sales would come in between $447.0 - $452.0 million.
Based on ARC’s Q3 2010 results, I’m now revising that guess to somewhere between $441.0 and $446.0 million.
Earlier this year, AEC industry analysts – and some financial analysts – were projecting that the construction industry would be off another 10% in 2010 vs. 2009. ARC’s 2010 Sales results appear to be tracking that decline pretty closely.
ARC’s Q3 2010 press release said this, “Management noted that the Company acquired six new Global Services accounts since June, which are projected to generate more than $9 million in sales for 2011. The accounts were won primarily on the strength of ARC's managed print services offering.”
Questions about the above statement:
a) Regarding the six “new” Global Services Accounts, were these accounts completely “new” to ARC? Or, were one or more of these accounts formerly “regular” (non-Global-Serivces) accounts at ARC? In other words, is the $9 million “all new” business to ARC?
b) who are these six new “Global services” accounts? And, which reprographers lost these accounts?
Despite the very deep recession the AEC industry experienced (and, for the most part, continues to experience), ARC continues to impress with positive earnings from operations.
After the market closed today, ARC reported its Q3 2010 results
Considering the fact that ARC released the bad news (the downward EPS and cash-flow revisions ARC previously announced) on October 11th, there were no surprises, whatsoever, in today’s Q3 2010 results press release.
Sales for Q3 2010 - $109.4 million
Sales for Q3 2009 - $119.4 million
Earnings for Q3 2010 - $300,000 (prox) (excluding the Goodwill impairment charge)
Earnings for Q3 2009 - $2.9 million (excluding Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges and excluding a charges related to ARC’s credit agreements)
EPS for Q3 2010 - $.01 per share (excluding the Goodwill impairment charge)
EPS for Q3 2009 - $.06 per share (excluding Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges and excluding a charges related to ARC’s credit agreements)
ARC’s Sales, for the first 9 months of 2010, came in at $336.7 million
ARC’s Sales, for the first 9 months of 2009, came in at $389.9 million
ARC’s Sales, for Q4 2009, came in at $111.7 million
ARC’s Sales for the full year 2009, came in at $501.6 million
In a post I did on this blog on August 4th, 2010, I “guessed” that ARC’s full-year 2010 Sales would come in between $447.0 - $452.0 million.
Based on ARC’s Q3 2010 results, I’m now revising that guess to somewhere between $441.0 and $446.0 million.
Earlier this year, AEC industry analysts – and some financial analysts – were projecting that the construction industry would be off another 10% in 2010 vs. 2009. ARC’s 2010 Sales results appear to be tracking that decline pretty closely.
ARC’s Q3 2010 press release said this, “Management noted that the Company acquired six new Global Services accounts since June, which are projected to generate more than $9 million in sales for 2011. The accounts were won primarily on the strength of ARC's managed print services offering.”
Questions about the above statement:
a) Regarding the six “new” Global Services Accounts, were these accounts completely “new” to ARC? Or, were one or more of these accounts formerly “regular” (non-Global-Serivces) accounts at ARC? In other words, is the $9 million “all new” business to ARC?
b) who are these six new “Global services” accounts? And, which reprographers lost these accounts?
Despite the very deep recession the AEC industry experienced (and, for the most part, continues to experience), ARC continues to impress with positive earnings from operations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
