Monday, December 27, 2010

Florida Reprographics (Tampa, FL) files Chapter 11 Bankruptcy (Part 2)

On December 22nd, I did a "first post" about Florida Reprographics filing for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, so this post, today, is simply a follow-up post.

Years ago, when there was a legal controversy surrounding the demise (Chapter 7 Bankruptcy) of the Louis Frey Company, a long-time, large reprographer based in NYC, and one of the pioneers in the FM (OnSite) business, I got a subscription to "Pacer", the government-run web-site that contains information about all U.S. bankruptcies. Bankruptcy information (filings and proceedings) are a matter of "public record." If you want your own account with Pacer, go to www.pacer.gov and sign up. I've just reactivated my Pacer account, so that I could do some research on the Florida Reprographics bankruptcy case. And, last night, I went through (and PDF'd and saved on my laptop) a whole host of the documents that have been filed in conjunction with the FR BK case.

First, a bit of background information..... for those of you who enjoy history.....


Florida Reprographics was founded sometime around 1984/5, after the owner, Chris Charles, relocated to sunny Tampa from New York City. When he was in NYC, Chris was with National Reprographics (NRI), and he was the VP of Sales (or the "Sales Manager"), for several years, at NRI under Sol Magid, the then President of NRI. In other words, prior to opening FR in Tampa, Chris had already had a lot of experience in the reprographics business, at least on the "sales side" of the business. When FR was first founded, Chris had partners, Martha and Nick Korman [who had relocated to Tampa from New Jersey, both having worked at Trukmann's, Nick's family's reprographics business (and still owned by Paul Korman, Nick's brother.)] However, soon after FR came into being, Nick and Martha pulled out, returned to New Jersey (or NYC) and, later on, in 1986, returned to Tampa and, literally on a shoe-string, founded (with Greg Williams as their partner) Bay Reprographics (which later, through a name change, became National Graphic Imaging (NGI.) So, by 1986, when Bay (NGI) was founded, FR was already about 1 or 2 years old. And, of course, the companies, FR and Bay (NGI), became "heated" competitors. Around that same time, Jack Dunn founded TRS (Tampa Reprographics Services. Jack also owned Dunn Blueprint (Detroit area.) Tampa has better weather than Detroit, I guess. Together with The Huey Company of Chicago, Dunn joint-ventured Orlando Reprographics, but, not long after that, Jack (Dunn) pulled out of the Orlando Reprographics deal (left it to Huey) and that's when Jack decided to found TRS in Tampa. So, by 1986, there were at least 3 Tampa-based reprographers, founded by "northern folks", operating in the Tampa Bay market.

Well, over the many years that followed, the Tampa Bay Area real estate development market "took off", and, for years, there was plenty of business for everyone .... until the proverbial "rock hit a hard place" and the market for reprographics began to trend down during 2007. I joined NGI when NGI's sales were around $5.2 million (1997 Sales, adjusted for inter-company sales) and "retired" from NGI in December 2007, when NGI was sold to ARC. One of the reports issued when ARC purchased NGI indicated that NGI's sales were around $23 million. I'm only mentioning that to give my readers a bit more perspective. Of course, it is not fair to compare NGI's Sales to Florida Reprographics' Sales, because, by 2007, NGI was operating in Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Ocala and Atlanta and, by comparison, FR only had operations in Tampa (well, maybe it was around that time that FR opened a location down near Sarasota?) Anyway, I've said all this simply to make this point: "sounds like" Chris Charles would have been better off if Martha and Nick Korman had remained his partners in FR. NGI grew MUCH larger than FR and NGI was sold for a lot of money. FR remained a "small company" (still certified by City of Tampa Gov as a "small business" enterprise as late as 2010-11) and is now in Chapter 11. Oh well, "they say that" ..... "success in business is a matter of making more right decisions than wrong decisions." Note that a few years ago, we (NGI) did have informal discussions with Chris about buying FR, but nothing came of that.

Second, okay, now to the point of todays post; to share with my blog-readers some of the information that's contained in the documents already filed in FR's Chapter 11 BK case .....

(1) Sales Revenues:


One of the questions asked on one of the BK forms pertains to recent years’ sales revenues. Actually, the form refers to it as “gross income”. But, I think that means that the BK court wants to know “gross sales” or maybe it’s “gross receipts” (the latter would be the case with a “cash-basis” business); here’s the response to that question:

  • 2010 YTD - $490,000 (apparently, this is YTD through Nov 30, 2010)
  • 2009 - $843,784
  • 2008 - 1,388,967
  • There was no requirement to reveal 2007 Sales, but, since NGI had a healthy year in 2007, I’m going to guess that FR did as well and that FR’s Sales for 2007 were around $2,000,000, if not somewhat greater than that. If I’m fairly accurate with that guess, then that would mean that FR’s sales have fallen by approximately 74% since “peak” times. As I’ve said in other blog posts, this kind of fall-off in Sales is evidence that Florida’s reprographers have been dealing with a depression, not a recession. The only other comment I can make about FR’s sales decline, WOW, OMG!

(2) Location:

Evidently, FR relocated its business to a new location (under a 5-year lease) the day the BK filing took place. New location (4614 Eagle Falls Place) appears to be in southeastern Tampa, not exactly a “quick” commute to downtown Tampa and well away from the WestShore business district (where NGI’s main branch is located.) FR had been located, for many, many years, at 655 N. Franklin Street in the “heart” of downtown Tampa.

At one point, FR opened a branch location in the Lakewood Ranch area of Sarasota. I don’t know if that FR location is still open. That location is not mentioned in the BK filings. It may be a separate corporation not subject to FR’s recent BK filing. Or, that location may have been closed previously.

(3) Unsecured Creditors:

One of the things that you have to do when you go Chapter 11 BK is file a list of your top 20 unsecured creditors. I looked at that list, but decided not to publish the list that was initially filed on Nov 30th, because a subsequent filing added to that initial list, and that subsequent filing (on Dec 14th) contained a few creditors that the initial filing did not include. The most remarkable difference between the first list and the second list. On the second list (Dec 14th), Chris Charles is listed as an unsecured creditor in the amount of $600,000! That debt did not appear on the original list. Here’s the complete list of unsecured creditors, per the Dec 14th filing:

  • Christopher Charles (who is the 100% shareholder of FR) $600,000
  • OCE USA $46,491
  • TWC Fifty-Eight Inc. $41,601
  • Wells Fargo $30,560
  • US Bank, NA $24,000
  • BB&T Financial $16,699
  • Xerox Capital Services $12,755
  • A1 Contract Staffing $11,496
  • Inquest Technologies $7,770
  • Staples Credit Plan $6,918
  • Derrick Guenther $6,491
  • Precision Paper $5,108
  • Accurate Laminating $3,215
  • Zeno Office Solutions $2,977
  • General Binding Corp $2,804
  • KIP America $2,410
  • Citrus Computer $2,078
  • Mall Office Products $1,800
  • American Express $1,753
  • ABC Imaging $1,728
  • BP Oil $1,706
  • NuKote $1,573
  • Pitney Bowes $1,120
  • Steven Enterprises $1,050
  • Technical Image Products $1,017
  • Thoroughbred Software $981
  • CitCards $898
  • Idearc Media (a) $781
  • Lightyear Network Solutions $779
  • Idearc Media (b) $720
  • Stephen Fossler $615
  • Sign-It-Quick $483
  • Konica Minolta $460
  • Uline Supply $113
  • Communication Technologies $110
  • UPS $63
  • Fedex $16
  • Approximate total of unsecured creditor debt $841,139
Apparently, one creditor, ABC Imaging, has a “set-off” against the debt that it is owed by FR. I think that means that ABC Imaging must owe at least that amount to FR for work FR did for ABC Imaging.

(4) Secured Creditors:

One secured creditor is GMAC/Ally Financial, and it says that the gross amount of this debt is $4,600. It also says that there is collateral assigned to this debt and that the value of the collateral (I think a 2007 GMC Sierra) is $2,000. [If I interpreted this information accurately, then I’d like to buy a 2007 GMC Sierra for $2,000, if it’s undamaged!]

The major (and apparently the only other “secured”) creditor is PNC Bank (Philadelphia), and I think this was an SBA Loan, since the SBA is mentioned in conjunction with this loan. About PNC Bank loan to FR, it says this:

Total Amount Owed $540,000

Less: Estimated Value of Collateral $(212,282)
Estimated Unsecured Portion $327,718

PNC Bank filed UCC-1, Blanket Lien on A/R, BBT checking account, chairs, furnishings, lateral files. Comment: apparently, the collateral pledged against this loan did not include any “equipment” assets, and I kind of wonder “what was the bank thinking?”

On one of the schedules, Chris Charles is listed as a "co-debtor" on the loan from PNC Bank. I think that means (but, certainly, I am not 100% sure) that he must have personally guaranteed that loan.

To the extent that the liquidated value of the collateral (estimated to be $212,282) does not satisfy the total ($540,000) loan amount, the remaining debt becomes part of the “unsecured” debt (at least that’s my understanding of how that works.)

(5) Priority Claims (debts):
  • Florida Dept of Revenue – Sales Taxes $3,000
  • Hillsborough County Tax Collector – Personal Property Taxes $6,100
(6) Pending Lawsuits:

The BK filings reveal two pending lawsuits:
  • OCE North America vs. Florida Reprographics; Re: Breach of Contract
  • TWC Fifty-Eight vs. Florida Reprographics; Re: Breach of Contract (landlord of location vacated on or before November 30th, 2010)
(7) Equity Ownership of FR:

The BK filings indicate that “Chris Charles” is the 100% shareholder of FR, and that he has been the 100% shareholder for at least one year before the BK filing date.

(8) “Insider Compensation” Disclosure:

One of the questions (or, call it “disclosures”) that FR had to respond to in the BK paperwork was this:

“Withdrawals from a partnership or distribution by a corporation: If the debtor is a partnership or corporation, list all withdrawals or distributions credited or given to an insider, including compensation in any form, bonuses, loans, stock redemptions, options exercised and any other perquisite during one year immediately preceding the commencement of this case.”

This was the response to the above disclosure requirement:

  • Nancy Turon; ex-wife of Chris Charles and employee of the debtor (FR); purpose: compensation $12,500
  • Jennifer Charles; relation, daughter of Chris Charles and employee of the debtor (FR); purpose: compensation $14,625
  • Chris Charles, relation: President/Owner; purpose: compensation $100,000
  • Chris Charles, relation: President/Owner: purpose: repayment of shareholder loan $19,629
(9) Assets of Florida Reprographics:

As per one of the schedules filed on December 14th, were….

From Schedule B - Personal Property (Assets)
  • Petty Cash Fund $275
  • BB&T Checking Account $635

  • Accounts Receivable $123,229

  • 2007 Mercedes SL550, leased from US Bank $35,000
  • 2007 GMC Sierra $2,000
  • a) Chairs, furnishings, lateral files, storage cabinets, desks, tables, etc. $15,000
  • b) Computers and plotter system equipment $63,143
  • c) Drymount, binding machine, standard cutter, four punch system, OCE TCS 400 color 2-roll plotter with scanner, canon digtial imagepress, Rioch color printer/copier, Canon b/w printing press, Canon b&w production printer, KIP large--format printer $175,000
  • Paper, toner, supplies $10,000

  • Total Estimated Value of Assets, per schedule filed $424,282
I found the “groupings” of the equipment assets to be interesting and found myself wondering why each piece of equipment is not listed and valued separately.

(10) Interim Use of Cash Collateral:

On December 21, 2010, the Court approved a motion to let FR use the “cash collateral” for conducting its business operations, but, apparently, there will be another hearing on this matter on Jan 5, 2011. I think this means that FR is allowed to use its A/R collections to fund business operations, in spite of the fact that PNC has secured interest in the cash collected from A/R.

(11) Interim Order Granting Motion for Authority to Pay Affiliate Officer Salary:

On December 1st, FR filed a “Motion” regarding on-going compensation for Chris Charles, President of the Debtor (FR):

Case8:10-bk-28642-MGW Doc6 Filed12/01/10 Page1of6 In re: FLORIDA REPROGRAPHICS, INC.,
Debtor. Case No.: 8:10-bk-28642-MGW Chapter 11
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
MOTION FOR AUTHORITY TO PAY AFFILIATE OFFICER SALARY
(Expedited Relief Requested)

FLORIDA REPROGRAPHICS, INC. (the “Debtor”), by and through the undersigned counsel, pursuant to Administrative Order TPA-2005-2, hereby files this Motion for Authority to Pay Affiliate Officer Salary (the “Motion”) and, in support thereof, respectfully state as follows:

Background
  • 1. The Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11, title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) on November 29, 2010 (the “Petition Date”).
  • 2. Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has continued to operate its business as debtor in possession pursuant to §§1007 and 1008 of the Bankruptcy Code. No unsecured creditors committees have been appointed in these cases.
  • 3. The Debtor operates a document reproduction and management company with a specific emphasis on the reproduction of blueprints and construction documents located at 633 N. Franklin Street, Tampa, Florida 33602.
  • 4. The Debtor is owned by Christopher W. Charles (“Mr. Charles”) who qualifies as an “affiliate” under §101(2) of the Bankruptcy Code.
  • 5. Mr. Charles has successfully managed the debtor’s business for over twenty-five years. Mr. Charles has been intimately involved in every major decision regarding the Debtor’s business operations.
Relief Requested:
  • 6. The Debtor requests authority to pay a postpetition biweekly salary of $4,000.00 to Mr. Charles as well as reimbursement of reasonable business expenses to Mr. Charles.
  • 7. Mr. Charles will continue to serve as the President of the Debtor postpetition and, in this role, he will be responsible for providing the following services:
  • a. serving as the Debtor’s chief executive officer with responsibility for all day- to-day activities and employee personnel and for implementing strategies designed to maximize the short and long-term profitability of the Debtor;
  • b. leading and directing the Debtor’s managers, employees and agents;
  • c. working with the Debtor’s counsel in the administration of the Debtor’s businesses under the protection of Chapter 11;
  • d. representing the Debtor in the Bankruptcy Court and in meetings with any committees, the United States Trustee, local government and regulatory authorities, the media, and thegeneral public;
  • e. representing the Debtor in their negotiations with vendors, suppliers, landlords and other general creditors; and
  • f. working with counsel, any creditors’ committees, and other creditors in formulating and confirming the Debtor’s plan of reorganization.
  • 8. Although Chapter 11 provides a debtor with certain benefits in its attempt to reorganize its financial affairs, there are also burdens and obstacles inherent in any Chapter 11 case that must be addressed by management. As a result of a Chapter 11 case, a debtor’s management is faced with new obstacles in conducting its business affairs and substantial additional reporting and paperwork requirements. Mr. Charles will be required to assume additional duties, some of which did not exist prior to the Petition Date and others of which are greatly expanded subsequent to the Petition Date. Specifically, Mr. Charles will have to spend significant time and effort to ensure that the Debtor’s business remain viable during the pendency of these Chapter 11 cases.
  • 9. During the one year prior to the Petition Date, Mr. Charles received the same compensation requested herein from the Debtor.
  • 10. The Debtor believes that payment of reasonable postpetition compensation to Mr. Charles is necessary to allow the Debtor’s businesses to operate postpetition. Mr. Charles will not be providing any services to any third-parties postpetition and, other than the compensation proposed herein, Mr. Charles will not be receiving any postpetition compensation from third-parties.
  • 11. All applicable payroll taxes related to Mr. Charles’s compensation will be paid concurrently with the payment of such compensation.
  • 12. In accordance with Administrative Order TPA-2005-2, the Debtor requests that an expedited hearing be set on the Motion within three (3) business days.
WHEREFORE, the Debtor requests that this Court enter an order (a) granting the Motion, (b) authorizing the Debtor to pay reasonable postpetition compensation to Mr. Charles and (c) grant such other and further relief as is just and appropriate. Dated: Tampa, Florida December 1, 2010

Responding to the above “Motion”, this was the subsequent decision issued by the Court:

On December 21st, the US Bankruptcy Judge “GRANTED” a Motion (filed by FR) to pay Chris Charles (as President of the Debtor) an “interim salary” of $4,000 on a bi-weekly basis. The court will hold a “continued preliminary hearing” on the “Motion” on January 5th at 11:00 a.m. The “granted” motion contains this provision: “no compensation shall be paid to the officers or insiders unless, at the time of such payment, the Debtor (FR) is current with and has made payment of all operating expenses, including any adequate protection payments to be paid to PNC Bank. The “granted motion” contains a further provision: “in the event the compensation authorized to be paid herein (that refers to the $4,000 bi-weekly amount) is not paid because the Debtor (FR) is not current with its operating expenses, any unpaid compensation shall not accrue as a cost of administration herein.”

(12) Notice of (and date set for) Creditor’s Meeting:

PLEASE NOTE: IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR OF FR, DO NOT RELY ON MY BLOG FOR THE DATE OF THE CREDITOR’S MEETING OR THE FILING DEADLINE FOR FILING YOUR CLAIMS. TO PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS, REFER TO THE PAPERWORK SENT TO YOU BY THE COURT OR CHECK THE COURT’S RECORDS FOR THE MOST RECENT, RELEVANT INFORMATION!!!

The paperwork filed in the FR BK case reveals this information:

“Notice of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case, Meeting of Creditors, & Deadlines A chapter 11 bankruptcy case concerning the debtor Corporation listed below was filed on November 30, 2010.”

“You may be a creditor of the debtor. This notice lists important deadlines. You may want to consult an attorney to protect your rights. All documents filed in the case may be inspected at the bankruptcy clerk's office at the address listed below. NOTE: The staff of the bankruptcy clerk's office cannot give legal advice.”

Meeting of Creditors -
Debtor(s) must present Photo ID and acceptable proof of Social Security Number at § 341 meeting. You are reminded that Local Rule 5073−1 restricts the entry of cellular telephones into the Courthouse.
Date: January 7, 2011
Time: 01:30 PM
Location: Room 100−B, 501 East Polk St., (Timberlake Annex), Tampa, FL 33602


Deadlines to File a Proof of Claim -
Proof of claim must be received by the bankruptcy clerk's office by the following deadline:
For all creditors (except a governmental unit): February 14, 2011
For a governmental unit: 180 days from the date of filing


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Joel’s additional comments:

(1) It will be interesting to see if any of the creditors, secured or unsecured, protest the inclusion of the $600,000 “shareholder debt” as an unsecured debt of FR. One of my BK-knowledgeable friends said that debt could be “construed” as equity in FR, rather than debt.

(2) It is sad that Chris Charles had to take his company, Florida Reprographics, into bankruptcy, after a 26 (or so) year run. Like I said in my first post about FR’s bankruptcy, I guess it is simply “a sign of the times.”

Gill Reprographics Inc (GRI) - a U.S. Reprographics Industry "mover and shaker" with 15 locations

Well, “when you think you know quite a lot”, think twice about that.

In previous blog-posts about “movers and shakers” in the U.S. reprographics industry, I’ve mentioned American Reprographics (ARC), Thomas Reprographics, ABC Imaging, Lynn Imaging, C2 Reprographics, Service Point, National Reprographics (NRI) and several others, but, somehow, the growth of Gill Reprographics (GRI) managed to slip under my radar screen. (Note: I’ve previously pointed out that I don’t have a working crystal ball, and, now, I’m going to admit to you that my “radar screen” has, apparently, not been working well.)

While surfing the net for information about reprographers this morning, I visited the web-site of Gill Reprographics. Until I visited GRI’s web-site this morning, I HAD NO IDEA THAT GRI had expanded to 15 location
s!

Evidently, Gary Gill’s sons, Mark and Steve, are extremely aggressive “2nd generation” business operators. Starting out in Oklahoma (of all places), GRI now operates 15 locations, and, if GRI manages, at some point, to add a location in Boston, NYC, or Washington, DC (or maybe Miami), we can then begin referring to GRI as a mini-nationwide enterprise.

I first met Gary Gill (a super-nice guy) founder of GRI, when he was working for Ridgway’s, and it was Tog Rogers (then owner of Ridgway’s; Ridgway’s is now an ARC-owned company) who introduced me to Gary. By the time I had first met him (which, I think, was around 1986), Gary had worked at Ridgway’s for a number of years, and, since he was then in a senior management role with Ridgway’s, he, of course, knew all of the players at Ridgway’s many branches, many of which were in Texas and in other Southwestern markets. Sometime after I first met Gary, I bumped into him at an IRGA Convention, and he told me that he had left Ridgway’s and had gone into the reprographics business, on his own, in Oklahoma. Well, it looks like Gary’s son’s have taken that business to a “whole nother level.” Given the number of branches GRI now operates in Texas, could it be that former Ridgway’s team members (or even owners) have contributed to the expansion of GRI?

Here’s the “About Us” on GRI’s web-site:

“Welcome to Gill Reprographics, Inc.”

“Founded in 1987 in Oklahoma City, OK, by Gary Gill, a 30+ year veteran of the reprographics industry, Gill Reprographics (GRI) has grown nationally and is now under the guidance of the second generation of Gills: Mark and Steve. With 15 locations across the country, GRI is looking to expand even further in the near future.”

And, here’s the listing of GRI’s locations:


ARIZONA:

GRI - Tempe, AZ

621 S. 48th Street
Suite 108
Tempe, AZ 85281
 Phone: (480) 829-9800
Fax: (480) 829-9100
tempeorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Brian Lee

CALIFORNIA:

GRI - Irvine, CA

17835 Sky Park Circle
Suite O
Irvine, CA 92614
 
Phone: (949) 251-9488
Fax: (949) 251-9486
irvineorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Ron Hill

GRI - San Francisco, CA

603 Commercial Street
Ground Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
 Phone: (415) 956-8080
Fax: (415) 956-8070
sforders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Clint Walston

ILLINOIS:

GRI - Chicago, IL

17W715 Butterfield Road
Suite B
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
 Phone: (630) 652-0800
Fax: (630) 652-0801
chicagoorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Terry Benson

OKLAHOMA:

GRI - Oklahoma City, OK

7001 N. Santa Fe Ave.
Oklahoma City, OK 73116
 Phone: (405) 947-6891
Fax: (405) 947-6892
okcorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Kevin McFarlin

GRI - Tulsa, OK

5333-F South Mingo Road
Tulsa, OK 74146
 Phone: (918) 384-0290
Fax: (918) 384-0292
tulsaorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Paul Mullenix

GRI - Tulsa - Downtown

317 S. Main Street
Suite 120
Tulsa, OK 74103
 Phone: (918) 599-9499
Fax: (918) 599-9494
dttulsaorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Paul Mullenix

GEORGIA:

GRI - Atlanta, GA

5825 Glenridge Drive
Building 1, Suite 106
Atlanta, GA 30328
 Phone: (404) 252.7775
Fax: (404) 252.7780
atlantaorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Tim Neuman

MINNESOTA:

GRI - Minneapolis, MN

701 Decatur Avenue North
Suite
112
Golden Valley, MN 55427
 Phone: (763) 544.1818
Fax: (763) 544.0465
msporders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Mike Wiseman

TEXAS:

GRI - Addison, TX

15058 Belt Way Drive
Suite 110
Addison, TX 75001
 
Phone: (214) 217-4800
Fax: (214) 217-4804
addisonorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Wade Johnson

GRI - Austin, TX

301 Congress Ave
Suite 130
Austin, TX 78701
 
Phone: (512) 478-8000
Fax: (512) 478-2190
austinorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Joe Padilla

GRI - Dallas - Empire Central

1451 Empire Central
Suite 600
Dallas, TX 75247
 
Phone: (214) 267-0243
Fax: (214) 267-0235
dallasorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Wade Johnson

GRI - Dallas - 75 at SMU

6060 North Central Expressway
Suite 123
Dallas, TX 75206
 Phone: (214) 302-5821
Fax: (214) 302-5825
dallas75orders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Wade Johnson

GRI - Fort Worth, TX

126 South Main Street
Suite 120
Fort Worth, TX 76104
 Phone: (817) 529-3900
Fax: (817) 529-3901
fworders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Wade Johnson

GRI - Houston, TX

11201 Richmond Avenue
Suite A104
Houston, TX 77082
 Phone: (281) 558-7070
Fax: (281) 558-7075
houstonorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager: Tommy Padilla

GRI - San Antonio, TX

1227 Safari
San Antonio, TX 78216
 Phone: (210) 404-1611
Fax: (210) 404-1633
saorders@gillrepro.com
Branch Manager

Sunday, December 26, 2010

OCE Expands Managed Print Services Offerings

"Managed Print Services", offered by OCE, Pitney Bowes, Xerox, Ricoh, Canon, and, for sure, HP, compete with "reprographers" for business.......

This is the text of a Press Release recently issued by OCE.....

Managed Print Services

Tuesday, 21 December 2010 17:08
Businesses of all sizes can now take advantage of the Océ MPS program

TRUMBULL, CONN. December 21, 2010 – Océ, an international leader in digital document management, today announced the expansion of their Managed Print Services (MPS) program to include the new MPS Express for small office environments, and MPS Enterprise for mid- to large-sized office environments. The Océ MPS program is designed to help corporate office environments manage their printing network, quickly and easily without the added pressure of having to invest in new printing hardware. Océ MPS offers clients of all sizes the ability to get started with MPS fast, while still realizing their specific goals and objectives for cost containment, supplies inventory reduction and overall document lifecycle management efficiencies. This is achieved through leveraging the assets they currently have, reducing on-site supplies inventory and managing their devices proactively for service and support.

"A one-size-fits-all approach will not accommodate the needs of our diverse client base. MPS Express and MPS Enterprise were designed to provide a flexible MPS offering that can meet the requirements of any sized business," said John Reilly, President, Océ North America, Document Printing Systems. "Our approach is to extend our clients' print output resources and asset base, regardless of what vendors they currently have installed."

Through the Océ MPS program, Océ seeks to optimize clients' print environments by first taking inventory of their output assets and then leveraging their current print infrastructure and extending those resources. This offers clients far more value than recommending immediate hardware replacement. The Océ MPS program is uniquely hardware indifferent, as it does not require a hardware purchase and features a short-term, services- based contract. Océ actively engages clients that have a mixed-manufacturer, legacy output fleet, including both laser and non-laser devices.

MPS Express is a simple print management program designed to allow smaller office environments to get started with MPS immediately. Upon completing a quick and simple assessment, an Océ sales representative utilizes the MPS Express web-based tool to instantly generate a program proposal, which includes pricing based on the client's unique printing data and contract documents. There is no need for a lengthy assessment phase or installation of software to generate the proposal. Océ can begin monitoring and managing the client from day one.

MPS Enterprise is a more consultative engagement process designed for larger office environments. An Océ MPS analyst will collaborate with the client to work through their unique objectives, corresponding printing patterns and long-term goals in order to develop a customized program.

The Océ MPS program currently monitors and manages many devices within North America across various market segments, including legal, financial and health care.

To learn more about the latest enhancements to the Océ MPS program, visit http://global.oce.com/services/managed-print-services/managed-print-services/default.aspx or contact Robert Russell at (585) 533-3060 or Robert.Russell@oce.com.

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Downtown Miami, FL Office Market estimated to be 25% Vacant !!!

Drawing from an article on December 21, 2010 in the Miami Herald by reporter Douglas Hanks….

Miami, FL Office Space Reportedly 25% Vacant!

600,000 sq ft, 47 story, I.M. Pei-designed “Miami Tower” recently sold for $106 million to Chicago investors.

That works out to a price of around $175.00 per sq ft. By comparison, In 2008, a Japanese company, Sumitomo, paid around $332.00 per sq ft for a similar high-profile, downtown Miami office building.

Here, I'm quoting directly from the article:

75 PERCENT FULL
A recent report by CB Richard Ellis estimated downtown Miami's office buildings are about 75 percent full. That's compared to about 95 percent full when the real estate crash gained speed in 2008.

"Downtown Miami is experiencing the highest vacancy rate seen in years," the report said. Landlords "will need to offer aggressive terms to retain tenants and attract new tenants."


- - - - - - - - - - - -

Not directly related to the above ..... Google "the St Pete Times and Taj Mahal Courthouse" to read about the brand new Courthouse that just opened in Florida. Due to "arrogance of power and abuse of power", our Florida legislators and certain judges involved in the 1st District Court of Appeals managed to keep this project and the cost of the project under wraps until a reporter from the St Pete Times did an exhaustive investigation about the events that led to this incredibly wasteful, totally exorbitant, project in the midst of a deep recession.

This week, the Florida 1st District Court of Appeals moved into its brand-new “Taj Mahal”, 110,000 sq ft Court Facility. At a reported cost of around $50,000,000! That works out to a cost of $454.00 per sq ft. Even though Florida is buried in a deep recession, certainly our judges must be entitled to their new fancy digs!

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

"Paperless" Construction Projects ???

This blog is devoted to articles and information about the Reprographics Industry. Although Reprographers do generate revenues from providing "digital" services, such as document management services (including PlanRooms), Reprographers generate most of their revenues from "printing" documents. Without revenues from "printing" documents, what would Reprographers do, and what would that mean for the future of the Reprographics Industry? I don't know anyone with a working crystal ball. But, I do know, based on observations the past three years, that changes in the A/E/C industry, changes that negatively affect the future of "printing on paper", are coming along and are highly likely to increase as time goes on. I don't think that anyone expects any drastic changes in the very near term, but, how about next year, the year after, or three or four years from now? Yes, there will be a recovery in the A/E/C Industry, but that does not necessarily mean or guarantee that the volume of "printing" will recover proportionately.

What got me started on this post, was a visit to the site of a software company known as "Bluebeam.com" I had visited Bluebeam's site before, but not recently. If you are in the reprographics business, you MUST visit Bluebeam; there is a lot of information about how A/E/C customers use and benefit from using Bluebeam's PDF product. If you are not aware of what A/E/C customers are using and saying, then how in the world will you really know what's going on?

First of all, Bluebeam is located at www.bluebeam.com

There is a very interesting, very thought-provoking article, posted on Bluebeam's site, titled,
Paperless Construction Projects:
Implementing New Technologies to Digitize Project Communication

A White Paper by Architect Erica Lee RA, LEED AP

You can access that article at this Internet address:
http://www.bluebeam.com/downloads/documents/PaperlessConstructionProjects.pdf

There are a number of "case studies" on Bluebeam's web-site. You can access those case studies at this Internet address:
http://www.bluebeam.com/web07/us/solutions/casestudies/

Disclosure: I don't own any stock in Bluebeam, ..... but I sure wish I did!

AIA ABI Index for November 2010 - above 50, again, for the 2nd time in three months

AIA ABI Index for November 2010 is above 50, again.

That makes it two months out of three - (September AIA ABI Index was above 50 - October AIA ABI Index was below 50 - November AIA ABI Index is above 50.)

The post on the AIA's web-site is located at this Internet address:
http://www.aia.org/practicing/AIAB086702
...and I recommend that you go to that site, because they've included some nice and interesting graphs/charts!

Here's the Press Release that's on the AIA's web-site.


Title of the Press Release: Business upturn becoming more widespread, but firms cautious about potential 2011 improvement
By Kermit Baker, Hon. AIA
AIA Chief Economist

Revenue at U.S. architecture firms increased in November, only the second monthly increase in billings since early 2008. At 52.0, the AIA’s Architecture Billings Index (ABI) recorded a three point gain from the previous month, and reached its strongest level since December 2007. With ABI scores above the 50 level in two of the past three months, the prospects of a sustainable recovery in design activity are enhanced.

Regional revenue trends also are very encouraging. Firms in the Northeast, Midwest, and South all reported billings increases in November. The billings index for firms in the West increased 2.5 points in November, but since the index for this region remains below 50, it still reflected a modest decline from October levels.

Trends in billings by construction sector were more mixed. On the positive side, residential architecture firms report a solid increase in billings, with the index for that sector increasing to 54.3, its highest reading since mid-2007. On the negative side, the billings index for commercial/industrial firms dipped below 50 for the first time since last April. The billings index for institutional firms held steady, and has been slowly trending up for most of the year.

The AIA has recently begun collecting information on trends in newly signed design contracts, anticipating that this will serve as a leading indicator for future design billings. In November, fewer firms reported an increase in newly signed design contracts than reported an increase in billings, so workloads at architecture firms are not likely to begin to accelerate in the months ahead.

Still, slow going

While the national economic recovery continues, the pace of growth remains disappointing. The gross domestic product grew 2.5 percent in the third quarter when seasonally adjusted and annualized, which is somewhat below the pace of the first half of the year. Recent employment reports point to subpar growth continuing in the fourth quarter. Payrolls increased an average of 105,000 nationally through October and November, only slightly better than the 82,000 average monthly increases through the first three quarters of the year. Consumer sentiment numbers have been largely flat this year, and as a result, there have been only modest gains in consumer spending. Retail sales have increased at about a 6 percent pace through the first ten months of the year. However, these gains may be somewhat better than they appear to be, since inflation is running at only about 1.5 percent compared to year-ago levels, and is less than 1 percent when more volatile food and energy components are taken out.
The recent report on regional economic conditions (released December 1) by the Federal Reserve Board paints a generally negative, although mixed, picture of the commercial real estate markets. According to this report, the New York, Atlanta, and Kansas City districts noted some weakening in nonresidential activity, while the Boston and Dallas districts indicated some modest improvement. Boston, Richmond, Kansas City, and Dallas expressed optimism about the near-term outlook.

An uncertain year ahead

Given the uncertainty in the economy and the slow recovery in design activity, architecture firms are reasonably pessimistic about the outlook for 2011. Overall revenue growth is projected to average in the 2 to 3 percent range, but almost one in three firms expect revenue for 2011 to be below 2010 levels. Over half of these firms expect the falloff to be 10 percent or more. Still, well over four in 10 firms expect to see growth this coming year, with the remaining quarter anticipating that 2011 will be comparable to 2010.

Both residential and commercial/industrial firms are more optimistic about business conditions over the coming year. Half of the firms in each group are expecting revenue increases in 2011, while only one quarter are expecting declines. In contrast, almost half of institutional firms are expecting revenue declines over the coming year, with only 38 percent expecting growth. Regionally, firms in the Northeast and Midwest are expecting more favorable conditions in the future, with half of the firms in each of these regions expecting growth. Almost half of firms in the West anticipate revenue declines in 2011.

This month, Work-on-the-Boards participants are saying:

•“Healthcare continues to be strong in California, and education is seeing more opportunities for proposals.”—220-person firm in the West, institutional specialization.

• “Residential work continues to be additions and alterations. Small commercial tenant fit-ups are increasing.”—2-person firm in the Northeast, residential specialization.

• “Getting projects started has been very slow. We have seen interest from the corporate sector, which has been quiet in the past months.”—17-person firm in the Midwest, institutional specialization.

• “With numerous firms chasing every project, margins for those you win will remain thin.”—8-person firm in the South, commercial/industrial specialization.

"Transitioning" Management

One of the funniest comments I’ve ever heard anyone make about a transition in management!

Okay, let me admit that what’s funny to me is not funny to most, but I think that’s simply because I have a very weird sense of humor. (Remember, my ATF comedian is Lewis Black; that should tell you something about my sense of humor.)

Well, I want to share this one with you, but I first have to put it in perspective, meaning, give you some details.

Background …..


A few years ago, a company, with sales of around $23 million, was acquired by another company. Prior to its sale, this company had been one of the fastest growing, more profitable companies in its industry. Prior to its sale, this company had a very deep, very experienced management team. Even after its sale, virtually all of those management team members stayed on to operate the company for the acquirer.

But, as time went on, senior management of the acquirer decided to replace the acquired company’s soon-to-be-retiring President with another person, an outsider from one of the acquirer’s other business units, an outsider who had experience running a much smaller operation, a $3 - 4 million a year operation. Evidently, it was felt by the acquirer’s senior management that not a single one of the acquired company’s senior management team members was capable of stepping in to replace the departing President.

Business got worse and worse, as did morale. In time, all of the acquired company’s former management team members had left the business; either because they were let go or because they decided they did not want to be there any longer. Business and, especially, morale continued to get worse.

And, here’s the punch line …..

Even before he left the company, one of the acquired company’s senior officers, when talking to the acquired company’s former President (who had already departed the scene), remarked about the President’s replacement (who had been brought in from the outside), “the guy who replaced you was, we’ve heard, successful at running a 3 – 4 million a year operation. Perhaps when he gets our business down to that level, he will do well with our company!!!”


When I read that last sentence, I laughed out loud. I thought that comment was priceless.

ABC Imaging to establish operations in Shanghai ???

I heard from a friend this morning that ABC Imaging is planning to commence operations in Shanghai in the near future.

I don't know any more about that at this time, other that to say that, when I visited ABC Imaging's web-site this morning, I did not see Shanghai listed on ABC Imaging's "locations" map. I did see "Frankfurt, Germany" on ABC Imaging's locations-map, but I think that refers to ABC's "FM partnership" with Raak, a German reprographics enterprise.

Anyway, in spite of the "Great Recession", ABC Imaging continues to be very aggressive with expansion, not just in the U.S., but internationally as well. Far cry from ABC's initial founding in Washington, DC, when the first ABC location (around 1982) had five or six employees operating on the 2nd floor of a small building on 10th Street, NW. (Or maybe it was 11th Street?)

Florida Reprographics (Tampa, FL) files Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

I guess this is just a "sign of the times."

Surfing the Internet, yesterday evening, for information and news related to the Reprographics Industry, I accidentally came across this:

Recent Chapter 11 Filings - Florida

Debtor: Florida Reprographics, Inc.

Bankruptcy Court District: Middle (Florida)
Filing Date: 11/30/10
Case Number: 10-28642
Attorney: Adam L Alpert (I'm pretty sure that he is with the Bush Ross law firm in Tampa)

I've just applied to reactivate my account with Pacer, the Government operated court-reporting system that one can use to access filings at all bankruptcy courts, but I'm not yet able to get on line because I'm waiting, waiting, waiting for Pacer to e-mail me my password to enter the system.

After I've read through the filings, it's highly likely that I will do a detailed post about the FR's BK.

The interesting thing about Chapter 11 is that the BK company does not have to pay its unsecured creditors a dime for anything purchased prior to the BK filing and the BK company has the opportunity, through "reorganization" to disavow (cancel) rental agreements, leasing obligations (for both real estate and equipment) and employment agreements. The BK Chapter 11 laws are "all about" giving the company a chance at a "fresh start." I'm not saying that creditors won't eventually get all or some of what they are owed. There have been many BK's where creditors eventually got everything they were owed, and, of course, many other BK's where creditors ended up getting a percentage, and sometimes a very, very small percentage, of what they were owed. So, a Chapter 11 BK gives the owner "breathing room" and a "fresh start." I've followed several BK's before, and, based on what I've observed over the years, most "customers" could care less. Some say there's a "stigma" attached to filing for BK. Maybe there is, but I've not seen customers switch vendors simply because their vendor filed for BK.

I wonder what the BK Court would say if a competitor of FR submitted an offer that would pay creditors 100% of what creditors are owed in return for ownership of the company?

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Lynn Imaging - Kentucky & Ohio - Recent developments announced by Lynn Imaging

One of the most respected reprographics companies in the reprographics industry is a company known as Lynn Imaging. Lynn is led by JL Lynn and Mike Carter and Lynn also has my favorite CFO guy, Glenn Norvell. I’m really glad that I never had to compete with Lynn.

Interesting, but although Lynn Imaging is a ReproMAX member, Lynn developed and uses its own “Planroom” service product, known as “eDistribution”. That same “Planroom” service product is also used by Duncan Parnell, another large and very-well-respected reprographer that conducts operations in the Southeastern U.S.

Here are some fairly recent announcements (news) found on the web-site of Lynn Imaging, the largest reprographics enterprise in Kentucky (and they also have locations in Ohio):


1) Introducing LynnPrint – a mark up software and easy to print to PDF solution
Posted on November 02, 2010

Lynn Imaging is excited to release LynnPrint to the Kentucky and Ohio markets. Our clients are eligible to subscribe to this software if they purchase, or currently own a wide format printer from Lynn Imaging, or a Pay for Output plan. This software is simple to use with little or no training required. Use LynnPrint to mark up your PDF plan files, make your estimates and then send to the printer with ease. LynnPrint is available for only $9.99 per month. Contact a Lynn Imaging Customer Service Representative for more details.

2) University of Cincinnati Planroom and Printing Awarded to Lynn Imaging
Posted on September 17, 2010

Lynn Imaging is proud to announce that we are the official provider for planroom, printing and digital distribution services for the University of Cincinnati. All construction bid opportunities for the University of Cincinnati will be posted at www.uc-planroom.com. We are excited about this partnership with UC, and look forward to providing excellent customer service to the area. Lynn Imaging has two locations in Ohio; 5323 Mulhauser Road in West Chester, and our newest location is at 151 West Fourth Street in Downtown Cincinnati.

Here’s the “about us” information posted on Lynn Imaging’s web-site:

Lynn Imaging is a premier reprographics and color graphics company with five locations primarily serving Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio. In 2009, Lynn Imaging teamed with Eastern Engineering, a firm based out of Indianapolis, Indiana to service the Cincinnati, Ohio and Northern Kentucky regions. This strategic partnership expands Lynn Imaging’s ability to serve regional construction needs in Indiana and Ohio.

Lynn Imaging’s color graphics division, Monster Color is housed in 10,000 SF with the latest in printing equipment capable of producing high-quality advertising signage for marketing and advertising professionals with quick turnaround times.

The corporate office is located in Downtown Lexington, Kentucky. This office is home to Lynn’s e-Distribution department and the core business unit, high volume digital printers and bindery equipment for the small and large color and black and white reproductions. It also contains a wide format equipment showroom, featuring brands such as HP, CANON, OCE and KIP. All of Lynn Imaging’s locations are digitally connected, giving the ability to serve construction and advertising needs in a timely manner.

Most notably, Lynn Imaging maintains the value system that was built on in 1946. Lynn Imaging employees are loyal to their customers, and work to provide superior customer service. Each member of the sales team, executive committee, and managers working at Lynn Imaging average over twenty years of experience with the company. This unique team carries knowledge of the industry, and insight into customer needs which translates to peace of mind for their clients.

Lynn Imaging's mission is “to bring the values of our family and home to work, in order to better service our customers. We observe the rule of proprietorship and treat each customer, supplier and employee in the way we prefer to be treated. And because our customers are loyal, they deserve our highest standards.”

Lynn Imaging Locations:

Cincinnati- 
151 West Fourth Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202 
 513.372.6352
 513.372.6349

Frankfort
- 1122 US 127 South
Frankfort, KY 40601
 502.875.8341
 502.875.2231

Lexington
- 328 Old Vine Street
Lexington, KY 40507
 859.255.1021
 859.252.4178

Monster Color
- 432 Old Vine Street
Lexington, KY 40507
 859.226.5840
 859.255.1003

Louisville
- 11460 Bluegrass Parkway
Louisville, KY 40299
 502.499.8400
 502.499.0022

West Chester
- 5323 Muhlhauser Road 
West Chester, OH 45011
 513.454.1040
 513.454.1039