Saturday, April 5, 2014

Marathon Reprographics vs. Kevin Rowe, iPlanTables, et al – CASE DISMISSED

On March 19th, a “stipulation for dismissal” was filed with the Court.

"COME NOW the Plaintiff Marathon Reprographics, Inc. and Defendants Kevin Rowe and Beth Swanson, TRC Digital Services, LLC, TRC, Inc., iPlanTables, LLC, and James D. Costello, by and through their respective counsel, and hereby stipulate to the dismissal of the claims between them with prejudice. As between these parties, each party shall be responsible for and bear their own attorney’s fees and costs."

On March 24th, the court issued an “order” directing the case to be dismissed “in its entirety with prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs and fees.”

Okay, now for Law101 from Repro101…..

What does “dismissal with prejudice” mean?

In general, it means that the lawsuit may not be refilled, and as such, it operates as an adjudication on the merits.  The dismissal may be voluntary (that is, the plaintiff dismisses with prejudice when a settlement has been consummated), or it may be involuntary (often as an extreme sanction imposed by the court for disobedience to court orders). 

What does it mean to dismiss a court case because of prejudice? How about voluntary vs. involuntary?
I think what you mean to ask about is a case being dismissed "with prejudice" or "without prejudice." Those are the formal legal terms for the different ways cases get dismissed. Dismissing a case "because of prejudice" sounds like it got dismissed because a judge's racism or something like that – this is not true.
In the formal legal world a court case that is dismissed with prejudice means that it is dismissed permanently. A case dismissed with prejudice is over and done with, once and for all, and can't be brought back to court. 
A case dismissed without prejudice means the opposite. It's not dismissed forever. The person whose case it is can try again.
Cases are also dismissed voluntarily, by the person who filed the case, or involuntarily, by a judge. For example, you could file a small claims case and voluntarily dismiss your case either with or without prejudice. You could dismiss with prejudice, if there'd probably be no need to come back to court, because, say, you’ve been paid.  However, if you decided they wanted to sue in regular court, because the amount is too much for small claims court, you could voluntarily dismiss your small claims case without prejudice. That would allow you to try your case in regular court. You could even change your mind again and return to Small Claims by reducing your claim.
When cases are dismissed involuntarily, it's by a judge, against the wishes of the person whose case is dismissed. Involuntary dismissals happen when the judge decides the case can’t go forward because of a legal reason. Usually, they're the result of the other side filing a Motion to Dismiss, pointing out those reasons.
When a case is involuntarily dismissed by a judge, it could be with or without prejudice. Often, judges dismiss cases without prejudice, so that the person whose case got dismissed can try again after fixing the problem the other side pointed out.

Sometimes, though, judges dismiss cases with prejudice. Maybe the loser has already had chances to fix their case, and the judge concludes there's no simply way the case can go forward. But it could be lots of things. The result is that the case is closed. If your case was dismissed with prejudice it can be appealed to a higher judge, but you can’t start over from scratch and try again.

No comments:

Post a Comment