And, the beat goes on …..
In posts on the Reprographics 101 Blog, on
September 24th and 25th, we mentioned a lawsuit that was
filed, in July, by plaintiff Marathon Reprographics against defendants Kevin
Rowe, Beth Swanson, TRC Digital Services, Inc., TRC, Inc., Iplantables, LLC,
James Costello, and The Whiting Turner Contracting Co (the latter, a very large
GC based in the Baltimore area).
Marathon’s claim: Copyright Infringement
Subsequent to the initial filing, Kevin Rowe
(et al) filed a counterclaim against Marathon.
Case update (based on filings shown in
Pacer.gov, last checked on Dec 17):
On November 15th, the United
States Magistrate Judge ordered the parties to conduct a “settlement
conference”, on December 10th, in a courtroom in Kansas City, MO. In
that order, it says: “The purpose of the
settlement conference is to assist the parties in determining if settlement is
appropriate. The conference will be conducted in such a manner as not to
prejudice any party in the event settlement is not reached. To that end, all
matters communicated to the undersigned in
confidence will be kept confidential by her, and will not be disclosed to any
other party, or to the trial judge.”
The settlement conference was held on
December 10th and it lasted six hours. Those
attending and participating in the settlement conference included:
Plaintiff:
Shelley and Dominick Armato and Tim Harrison with counsel Kenneth N. Caldwell
Defendant
Rowe: Kevin Rowe and Beth Swanson with counsel Thomas V. Bender, Defendant TRC
Digital/TRC, Inc., and Costello: James Costello with counsel David L. Jacobson,
Defendant The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company: Richard Vogel with counsel
David Barnard appearing for Matthew Hubbard.
Apparently,
the only issue resolved was that the case was settled as to defendant
Whiting-Turner Contracting Company.
(In other words, Whiting-Turner is no longer involved in this
lawsuit.) Apparently, the other participants in this lawsuit failed to reach an
agreement as to how to settle this lawsuit.
Subsequent to the settlement conference,
Marathon did issue subpoenas to at least two different parties to “produce
documents” associated
with their discussions, dealings and correspondence with the defendants. Those receiving subpoenas to produce
documents include – Harkins Builders
(a general contractor / developer based in Maryland) and the University of Maryland Construction and Facilities Procurement
Department.
Blog Publisher’s comments:
I’m given to
nostalgia. Early in my career (our first
company was based in the Washington-Baltimore area), I did business with
Whiting-Turner, Harkins Builders, and the University of Maryland Construction
and Facilities Procurement Department.
In addition, I’m a graduate of the University of Maryland. I know Kevin Rowe personally. I used to work with James (Jim)
Costello. Both are upstanding, very
experienced gents. Although I’ve never
met the Armato’s, I have exchanged e-mails with Shelley Armato in the past (not
in pertaining, in any way, to this lawsuit), and I know, from friends in the
industry, that the Armato’s are fine, upstanding people.
As I said
in a previous blog post about this case, “I guess is that the only “winners” in
this case will be the attorneys who represent the Plaintiff and the attorneys
who represent the various different Defendants named in Marathon’s case.
As is usually the case in most civil lawsuits!”
By now,
some 54 different documents have been filed with the Court in conjunction with
this case, and there’s been at least one “mass” trip to the Court in Kansas
City. It’s not out of the realm of
imagination to speculate that, so far, the parties involved in this case have
already spent upwards of $50,000.00, if not more. I hope that the participants in this case
will soon find a way to settle/resolve their issues. I’d be glad to offer my services as “mediator”
for this case.
No comments:
Post a Comment